Marketing A Word That Kills: “Illegal”

Date Put forth on April 9, 2006 by XicanoPwr
Category Posted in Civil Rights, Eliminationism, Immigration, Immigration Debate, Nativism, Propaganda, Racism, Raza


On Saturday, April 8, in a joint venture with Harris County’s Democratic Party and Houston’s Democracy for Houston held a workshop on Immigration Reform in their first in a series of “Fighting Back! Workshops: ‘Talking the Talk’” workshops. The forum was hosted by Murvin Auzenne, chair of the HCDP Communications and Message Committee and the presenter was Immigration Attorney/College government professor Toni Medellin.

Stace Medellin at Dos Centavos gave a great summary of the workshop:

Medellin presented on the legal/legislative background to the immigration issue. Of importance was Medellin’s statement that neither the Senate Judiciary Committee or McCain/Kennedy bills have anything to do with “amnesty.” Medellin gave the legal definition for amnesty, which basically is defined as forgiveness for past wrongdoing without any punishment or sanction against those forgiven.

Murvin Auzenne proved how great an asset he is not just by organizing the workshop, but by also providing his insight on the framing and reframing of issues. Several discussion groups were formed for the purpose of creating values statements. Whether it was about valuing the workforce, or improving the security of the country, or valuing the diversity that a every ethnicity and race (including immigrants) provide to this country, the statements were the exact opposite of the republican and white supremacist mantra (they really aren’t much different if you visit websites like those of the White Camelia Knights of Cleveland, TX, the Minutemen, and Stormfront (White Aryan Resistance).

However, Toni Medillian did remind us of one relevant point: “If you take anything away from this workshop, it should be that we all learn not to call these hard-working people “illegal.” No Human Being is illegal.” And yes, Stace that was me that you probably heard.

To some, using the term “Illegal” vs. “Undocumented” is just a matter of semantics and to others it means a lot more. When one talks about a group of people who are referred to as, “illegals” it never includes people who have committed a crime such as murder, corruption or theft. Nor does it comprise of people who speed or play loud music at a party in the middle of the night. The purpose of the word “illegal” is only meant for one purpose – the “undocumented.” The word itself dehumanizes immigrants and brands them as criminals. Yet, frequent visitor and commentor, John Konop Congressional candidate for Georgia District 6, is quick to argue that in fact they have committed a crime and not acknowledging it would mean, we as a country would have to disregard other laws:

Should we stop enforcing traffic laws? Should we stop enforcing drunk driving laws? Should stop enforcing any of our criminal laws? Should we have no trespassing laws?

What Konop fails to understand, the label criminalizes the person and not the action they have committed. True the person may have committed a civil violation, but the label is used unfairly because it targets only one selective group of people in a way that tax cheats and car thieves are not viewed the same way. Therefore, if the claim being used by right wing extremist is that an undocumented immigrant apparently broke the law, then we should apply the same definition universally for all criminals.

Here is a short list that would now be considered under their logic:

  • the illegal former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham – California Republican admits selling influence for $2.4 million;
  • the illegal lobbyist Jack Abramoff – pleaded guilty to conspiracy, fraud and tax evasion charges;
  • the illegal Tony C. Rudy – pleaded guilty to charges that he conspired with the “illegal” lobbyist Jack Abramoff to corrupt public officials and defraud his clients;
  • the illegal Michael Scanlon – pleaded guilty for conspiracy to defraud Indian tribes;
  • the illegal Elliott Abrams – pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor charges of withholding from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence his knowledge of Oliver North’s Contra-assistance activities, Bush Sr. pardoned Abrams before trial;
  • the illegal Randal David Ankeney – Republican activist from Colorado, arrested on suspicion of sexual assault on a child with force;
  • the illegal Jim Bakker – indicted on 23 federal charges of fraud, tax evasion, and racketeering

This goes beyond semantics; it is a matter of demonizing and scapegoating a whole group for the country’s problems. This has been a regular practice whenever the US economy is faltering. This issue has been mentioned before.

History has shown the Mexican labor pool is heavily utilized during times of economic boom and repatriation during economic downturns. To American capitalist the border does not exist when it comes to exploitation. When it comes to minimum wage requirements, health care benefits, workman’s compensation insurance, and social security plans, both Migrant workers and employees of American firms in Mexico have always been excluded.

The reality is, under existing US immigration law, an undocumented immigrant is not a criminal nor have they committed a crime, the offense is considered a civil violation; the same way speeding is considered a civil violation. By singling out and pursuing undocumented immigrants for this country’s economic problems is unfair. It is racism for no other reason other than it being motivated by xenophobia and racial hatred. If not, the claim being false, then the names mentioned above and everybody who violates federal, state and local law should also be considered “illegal.”

Another erroneous argument by Konop:

The number used by open boarder supporter is $ 1800 dollars per immigrant. It cost around 10k to educate a kid per year, 10k per family healthcare per year, roads, parks. … Liberal Paul Krugman admitted the math does not add up.

Just because one liberal says it doesn’t mean I should mimic the current Repug lock-n-step policy. It is ridiculous to believe that stopping the flow of undocumented immigrants into this country, the health care crisis will end and we can now start singing Leo Reisman’s “Happy Days Are Here Again.”

In a recent Drum Major Institute report, Principles for an Immigration Policy to Strengthen and Expand the American Middle Class, DMI would argue that the opposite. In fact, not only is it wrong to believe that the undocumented immigrants are the cause of our economic problems, but it actually helps build a strong Middle-class.

Immigration policy should bolster – not undermine – the critical contribution that immigrants make to our economy as workers, entrepreneurs, taxpayers and consumers, because:

On average, immigrants pay more in taxes each year than they use in government services, and these taxes fund programs like Social Security that strengthen and expand the middle class.

By increasing consumer demand, immigrants generate economic growth that benefits the middle class: immigration is a major contributor to the expansion of Hispanic and Asian-American consumer markets – an estimated 12 percent of the nation’s 2004 purchasing power.

Immigrants also stimulate the economy by starting small businesses and attracting investment capital from their countries of origin.

There is always more than one answer to this problem, however, wingnuts refuse to admit the drain that is occurring within the healthcare and education system was created by depletion of the financial resources when Dudya instituted his pro-business/anti-citizen tax-cut and the multiple tax break to the BushCo corporations.

On TomPaine.com, Economic Policy Institutes’ Jeff Faux wrote:

Higher walls and more police will certainly make crossing the frontier more difficult, but recent history tells us they will not stop the illegal influx of immigrants any more than more enforcement has stopped the illegal flow of drugs. Neither will mass deportation, guest worker programs or amnesty get at the root causes, which are poverty and the lack of job opportunities south of the border.

Mexico is not the only source of illegal immigration, but it is by far the largest – representing over three-quarters of the total. Some 40 percent of the over 100 million people still living in Mexico say they would come to the United States if they had the opportunity, which can be bought for the roughly $2,500 or so it costs for a “coyote” to lead them across the border. Last year at least 400 died in the attempt.

It is not surprising that out of 400 who die, some end up dying at the hands of vigilantes are the same who call themselves Christians while at the same time wrap themselves around the American flag thumping their chest as they brutally beat the “savages” in the name of American security. Although blogger Rev. Mykeru’s “American Jesus” graphic was used to depict the lunacy of the right based fundamentalist in the push for the war in Iraq, the same graphic can also describe the same mentality of the base who feel it is ok to murder those who come across the border. How Christian of them, que no? Is this what they mean by Christian values?

Or maybe this is what they mean by family values.

In neighboring Maricopa County, the sheriff’s department is investigating the killing of eight men whose bodies were found from June to September in the desert west of Phoenix. Four of the killings took place over the past two months. The victims’ hands were bound by tape, telephone wires, or handcuffs. Seven were killed by large-caliber bullet shots to the head or body and one was beaten to death or stabbed. At least six of the victims were Mexican citizens; one was Ecuadoran.

Members of the anti-immigrant vigilante organization Ranch Rescue deny involvement in the killings, but admit they have mobilized some 50 people dressed in military-style camouflage gear and armed with semiautomatic rifles and pistols to hunt for undocumented border crossers in southern Arizona. [New York Times 10/23/02; La Jornada (Mexico) 10/20/02; Arizona Daily Star (Tucson) 10/22/02; El Diario (Ciudad Juarez) 10/19/02]

The photo below was taken by photographer Jose Palafox, the names on the Mexican side of the wall are the names of immigrants who ended up dying trying to have a better life.

It is true what they say about a picture being worth a thousand words that would explain the lack of photos in today’s mainstream media. As long as the many faces aren’t shown then they have no story – they have no voice.

Technorati: , , , , ,

Related posts

Tags | Print This Post Print This Post |
functional

4 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the Feed Comments (RSS) feed.

  1. Gravatar Icon John Konop Apr 14th, 2006 at 12:37 pm

    XP,

    Your article makes my point not yours. Second the $ 1800 dollar # was used by LA RAZA at a debate I was in. You can not find a legitimate study that backs up the illegal immigrants pay enough in taxes to cover the social services. Paul Krugman point is you can not fix the problem unless honest with facts.

    Cesar Chavez would not be for a guest work visa program that supplies 10 to 20mm workers with no rights. That is what you are advocating if you support the program.

    All I am saying is find the right number of immigrants that need to be here, that does not drive wages down for everyone. Also if they are here, make sure they have rights, healthcare and not living under ground. Also create trade deals that lift wages in places like Mexico, China…. not to exploit the workers and their kids.

    ) Immigration policy must strengthen the rights of immigrants in the workplace.
    • Under current immigration law, immigrant workers compete with their U.S.-born counterparts on an uneven playing field—to the detriment of both groups.

    • Because employers threaten undocumented immigrants with deportation, these workers cannot effectively assert their rights in the workplace by, for example, asking for raises, complaining about violations of wage and hour or workplace safety laws, or by supporting union organizing drives.

    • As long as this cheaper and more compliant pool of immigrant labor is available, employers are all too willing to take advantage of the situation to keep their labor costs down and are less willing to hire U.S.-born workers if they demand better wages and working conditions.

    • U.S.-born workers are left to either accept the same diminished wages and degraded working conditions as immigrants living under threat of deportation or to be shut out of whole industries where employers hire predominantly undocumented immigrants.

    When immigrants lack rights in the workplace, labor standards are driven down, and all working people have less opportunity to enter or remain part of the middle class. So a pro-middle-class immigration policy must guarantee immigrants full labor rights and make sure that employers cannot use deportation as a coercive tool in the labor market

  2. Gravatar Icon XP Apr 14th, 2006 at 9:51 pm

    I have to agree and disagree. It can go both ways. There will always be strike breakers. For example, when the NFL went on strike, the owners still went out and found strike breakers and paid them less money. The nature of the problem, we let corporations run this country. Even if we were to put the laws into place that still doesn’t garantee that will stay here. How are will going to stop them from going over seas or go South of the border to set up shop. We will still be unemployeed.

    As for education, I don’t know about GA but here in TX, state expenditures on public elementary and secondary education equal the sum of the state’s contribution to per pupil expenditures in a school district plus the average per pupil share of state costs on general education administration and support services. The state share to an area’s school district budget varies according to the resources available to the district. n general, the fraction of per pupil expenditure paid by the state varies inversely with the property tax collected by the school district. Average per pupil expenditure for each student is found by taking a weighted average of the per pupil expenditure of each school district by the average daily enrollment (ADE) figures reported by school districts to compute a district-wide average share of public schooling costs. The product of the PUMA’s average per pupil expenditure and the average fraction for which the state is responsible yields a dollar figure for the state’s elementary and secondary costs per pupil. This dollar figure is then allocated to every child, between 6 to 17 years old, who lives in the district and those who are enrolled which indicates “in public school.” The state incurs additional costs for general education administration and management that are not part of a school district’s per pupil expenditures. Additional education costs are incurred by limited English proficient (LEP) students who are eligible for special education services such as remedial skills and bilingual education programs. There is no satisfactory way to break out bilingual education costs without making gross assumptions about relative school district participation in these state programs. Per pupil expenditures are higher in school districts located in urban areas than in the surrounding school districts, partly reflecting the higher cost of education for LEP pupils. And remember that includes every student. It is hard to tell how many Spanish speaking students a school will have before funds are allocated. Sorry, I never bought into those numbers and are just fear tactics used by FAIR. The problem with groups like FAIR. The problem with think tanks, they are able to pull a con job because they know you will be too busy to look into the issue. Think about it, are you will be able to look into how everything is being funded. No, who has time. Say you make into Congress, will you be reading every bill that is submitted to you, not likely, not po

  3. Gravatar Icon XP Apr 14th, 2006 at 9:57 pm

    I guess I have limit.

    Revenues collected by the state that are paid directly by households include those from the gross income tax, sales and use tax, motor vehicle fees, motor vehicle taxes, alcoholic beverage tax, cigarette tax, inheritance/estate transfer tax, business personal property tax, and the realty transfer tax and 25% come from the coporate sector.

    As I was saying, with all the information overload provided by think tanks, there is no way one person can read how things are funded. I just gave you Texas, there are 49 other states and the US territories. Each states does its own funding.

    It is time for the corporate sector to share the wealth.

  4. Gravatar Icon John Konop Apr 15th, 2006 at 3:18 am

    XP,

    If you flood the country with second class status workers with no rights how do you win? Why do you think Wal-Mart,Tyson… all want a guest worker program? By the way the latino and African American communties will take the hit harder than they are getting it now.You are doing the work for the multi-national corporations.

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.

Bear
functional