The Few, the Proud, the Military’s “Green Card” Soldiers

Date Put forth on September 21, 2007 by XicanoPwr
Category Posted in Dream Act, Green Card Draft


Here are some facts about the DREAM Act nobody really wants to hear about. The connections with the Pentagon are becoming crystal clear. This is nothing more than a stealthy military recruiting component for the military’s and the chickenhawk’s poverty draft. Some may feel I am acting like a pendejo for making the claim that this legislation would allow many of our undocumented students to regularize their status by serving in the front lines of this country’s illegal and unjust war. Doesn’t anybody see this as a problem? By supporting this bill and then turn around and vocally oppose the war, we are nothing more but hypocrites. Last July, Senator Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, showed his true colors when it came to the undocumented immigrants’ usefulness to this unjust war. Sure, Durbin has been a consistent critic of the war in Iraq; his problem is against sending US born citizens into Iraq, but he has no problem sending the “Brown” to the frontlines to fight in a war he considers as the “worst foreign policy ever” because everybody knows Xicanos/as are “naturally drawn” to fight. Remarks from the Congressional Record.

On the floor of the Senate, when we return next week, we will resume consideration of the Defense authorization bill. It turns out that many in the Department of Defense believe, as I do, that the DREAM Act is an important part of making certain we have talented young men and women ready to serve in our military. I have spoken to people at the Department of Defense who support the idea of the DREAM Act. I think we ought to include it in the Defense authorization bill. I hope to have that opportunity. [snip]

I hope when we return to the Defense authorization bill we can make the DREAM Act part of that bill. Certainly, it is going to help our defense and help our military. I think it is going to help America even beyond that. [snip]

Mr. President, as I said, I rise to speak about legislation known as the DREAM Act, which I hope to offer as an amendment to the Defense authorization bill.

Some people might ask why the Senate should revisit immigration again and whether an immigration amendment should be included in the Defense authorization bill. The answer is simple: The DREAM Act would address a very serious recruitment crisis that faces our military.

Under the DREAM Act, tens of thousands of well-qualified potential recruits would become eligible for military service for the first time. They are eager to serve in the Armed Forces during a time of war. And under the DREAM Act they would have a very strong incentive to enlist because it would give them a path to permanent legal status.

The DREAM Act doesn’t mandate military service. A student who is otherwise eligible could earn legal status by attending college. It would be inconsistent with the spirit our volunteer military to force young people to enlist as a condition for obtaining legal status.

But the DREAM Act creates a strong incentive for military service. And many DREAM Act kids come from a demographic group that is already predisposed towards military service. A 2004 survey by the Rand Corporation found that 45 percent of Hispanic males and 31 percent of Hispanic females between ages 16 and 21 were very likely to serve in the Armed Forces, compared to 24 percent of White men and 10 percent of White women.

Let’s break down the numbers using the average that is being thrown around. According to the Department of Defense, 750,000 youths who benefit from the DREAM Act. However, Durbin states the high school dropout rate among undocumented immigrants is 50 percent. Therefore, that would mean, half of them are already unqualified, which now brings that number to roughly 350,000 undocumented immigrants who entered the United States before age 16 and graduated from high school would qualify. As Durbin noted, not all high school graduates will go on to college according to a study conducted by RAND. They found that roughly half of those students were “very likely to serve in the Armed Forces.” Since the military is eying about half of those students, we are now left with roughly about 25% of the original 100%, which means roughly 187,500 undocumented immigrants would choose college over the military option. Of those 25 percent, not everybody will automatically get to adjust from conditional to permanent legal resident status, they still have graduate from a two-year college or complete two years of a four-year degree before they can qualify baring any hurdles placed by the Sec of Education and their respective state. The current dropout rate during the first two years in college for immigrant students is between 50 to 68 percent. In the end, roughly 60,000 to 93,750 undocumented immigrants will be allowed to adjust from conditional to permanent legal resident status.

So in reality, who is really benefiting from this Act? Recently, Sen Durbin has agreed to drop the in-state tuition clause for the college option thereby eliminating the college option for thousands of undocumented immigrants. The DREAM Act’s education component is a wonderful dream, but as it stands, the only DREAM that is really being accomplished is the military’s DREAM - the few, the proud, the military’s Green Card Soldiers.

Related posts

Tags Tags: , , , , , | Print This Post Print This Post |
functional

6 Responses to “The Few, the Proud, the Military’s “Green Card” Soldiers”

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. odd We’ll Just Use Those Guys Standing Around the Parking Lot at Home Depot « Tiny Cat Pants Trackback on Sep 22nd, 2007 at 8:27 am

5 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the Feed Comments (RSS) feed.

  1. Gravatar Icon cindylu Sep 22nd, 2007 at 3:45 am

    I’ve heard this argument about the DREAM Act. The military provision has been in there in (I think) each iteration of the DREAM Act since 2001.

    I was at a conference on the issue of undocumented higher education students in the spring and watched as a member of the Association of Raza Educators argued with an undocumented student about the federal DREAM Act. The member of ARE was adamant in his opposition while the undocumented student questioned his privilege. The undocumented student had battled deportation and struggled to get through college. What struck me most was not that the two disagreed, but that the undocumented student called out the ARE member’s privilege as a US-born Chicano and US citizen.

    Undocumented students — at least the ones I know — recognize the faults in the DREAM Act and are still in favor of its passage.

    However, I definitely don’t like this stronger link to military service. In the past iterations, it was still there, but it was buried.

    Truthfully, I’m kinda torn on this.

  2. Gravatar Icon XicanoPwr Sep 22nd, 2007 at 7:31 am

    I hear you, I’m torn too. I had this exact discussion with my father yesterday. I have been holding back, but after talking with him. During our discussion I told him one of the reason I did hold back is because I am privilege and how it is easy for me to talk against because this bill does not concern me because I am already a US citizen.

    I understand that this might have been included since 2001 and that the military has had their hand in all the education bills, but why can’t we be different and make a stand. And if we know there are all these faults, why do we always have to settle for less?

    The message starts off as saying they are barred from the opportunities that make a college education affordable – in-state tuition rates, state and federal grants and loans, most private scholarships, and the ability to legally work their way through college.

    Immigrants are eligible to apply for a temporary six year “conditional” residence permit which would allow them to live legally in the US. That is the children, not the parents. Once they qualify, during those 6 years immigrants would NOT be eligible for any of the federal higher education grants. So there goes the Pell and Federal supplemental educational opportunity grants. The only options they really have are student loans and work study.

    There are times when something is better than nothing, but is this really the time. Fernando Suarez del Solar doesn’t think so and why should we. I guess all we can do it voice our concerns and let the people decide.

  3. Gravatar Icon CSTAR Sep 23rd, 2007 at 6:38 pm

    This issue needs to be discussed.. I agree “There are times when something is better than nothing, but is this really the time.”

  4. Gravatar Icon XicanoPwr Sep 24th, 2007 at 8:21 am

    I have struggled with it, pero, deep inside I just cannot send more people in harms way knowing that the conditions of our Latino schooling will make military enlistment the only “choice” for our undocumented youth. Knowing this, nor can I let more innocent people get blown up based on a carrot of “ifs.” Because even if they did serve, they still have to live life as a saint when they come back from the war. Ask Anslem Ifill has lived in the US for 25 years who is suffering form PTSD and is now being deported back to Trinidad. Because in this country the US giveth and the US taketh away in a heart beat.

  5. Gravatar Icon Scott Kohlhaas Oct 10th, 2007 at 1:01 am

    The dream act is further proof that the army is getting desperate and may try a full blown draft!

    Would you be willing to spread the word about http://www.draftresistance.org? It’s a site dedicated to shattering the myths surrounding the selective slavery system and building mass civil disobedience to stop the draft before it starts!

    Our banner on a website, printing and posting the anti-draft flyer or just telling friends would help.

    Thanks!

    Scott Kohlhaas

    PS. When it comes to conscription, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!

Speak your mind

Comment Policy: First time comments are moderated. Please be patient.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

functional