Shattered Dreams

Date Put forth on October 26, 2007 by XicanoPwr
Category Posted in Dream Act, Immigration, Immigration Debate


On Wednesday the Senate rejected the bill, the DREAM Act (S 2205), that would have provided a pathway to obtain permanent residency to children of undocumented immigrants – on the conditions that they seek a college education or enlist in the military. The legislation would have also made them eligible for federal student-loan and work-study programs.

The key procedural motion requiring to move ahead, cloture motion, on the Dream Act (the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act), failed to get 60 votes it needed. The motion fell eight votes short, with a tally of 52-44.

The DREAM Act at one point had 47 co-sponsors in the Senate but had little chance to pass because the immigration issue has become so toxic in American politics. Not surprisingly, the current toxic atmosphere has created behavioral or cultural obstacles both among the public and government officials, including those engaged in law enforcement services, against foreigners in general and groups of specific ethnic or national origins. This was evident as Representative Tom Tancredo of Colorado, Republican presidential campaign, sought to arrest three immigrant students who were attending a Capitol Hill news conference.

Tancredo contacted the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and asked them to take into custody the three students, who were to appear at an event in support of legislation. In a statement, Tancredo said, “If we can’t enforce our laws inside the building where American laws are made, where can we enforce them?” Tancredo’s action is not surprising considering he who is running for the Republican presidential nomination on a platform that is centered on his desire to crack down on illegal immigration.

According to a post on Politico, the three students were Tam Tran, a 24-year old Vietnamese graduate student; Marie Gonzalez, a 21-year old Costa Rican college student; and Manuel Bartsch, a college sophomore from Germany. All three young adults, who were introduced at a Capitol press conference, have been living in the US for years, but their parents entered the country illegally. All three currently face legal hurdles and potential deportation, but have been given a stay of deportation because of private bills that allow them to stay in the country temporarily.

Private bills are a rare form of relief from immigration laws and are usually reserved for the most compelling cases. In the 110th Congress there are 56 similar bills. In the legislative process, private bills are treated like any other law, going though the committee process to a vote by the full Congress. When a representative introduces a private bill, it is referred to the House Judiciary Committee’s Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security and International Law panel. According to The Hill:

The subcommittee, through formal action requiring normal quorum and a vote on the record, can then ask for a report from the Department of Homeland Security on the specific case. Traditionally, once the report is received, it places a hold on a person’s deportation – called a stay – until the end of the session…

Although the mere introduction of a bill does provide temporary relief, it does not legally mandate ICE to halt deportation proceedings, such as the case with Elvira Arellano who had several private bills introduced on her behalf by Congressman Gutierrez and Congressman Bobby Rush.

Many immigrant rights activist, immigrant students, and bloggers are mourning the defeat of the DREAM Act this week, and they are expressing their outrage toward anti-immigrant Democrats. I will not deny, I have voiced my reservation several times about this bill. Because of this stance, one commentor felt I “would rather see the de facto American youth in the shadows of low paying jobs.” It was exactly for this reason I cautioned my blogamigas/os on how they frame this issue because it was bordering on calling people like myself and Fernando Suarez del Solar as supporting the anti-immigration movement and for those who know me and know what I stand for it is a totally erroneous assumption.

While anti-migrant hate groups were very vocal and the main reason for the bill’s defeat, it is hard to deny that the military provision did play a factor for some pro-immigrant activists, which I feel a large majority DREAM Act supporters continue to disregard.

Because the undocumented youth lack legal documents, the DREAM Act did offer them a ray of hope of an otherwise a dark and uncertain road. But the fact is, many of them would have been tricked and manipulated in an immoral and criminal way because the existing school system locks out the children of working families with high tuition and inflated admissions criteria. Most will be forced to take the military option to get their green card. While the DREAM Act does state that if a person only had to enlist for two years in the military to qualify, the fact of the matter, there are no such thing as a two year military contract, everyone who enters the all-volunteer military incurs a total service obligation of eight years, a portion of which is spent on active duty. Unfortunately, this deadly component is strategically excluded from the debate by many Democrats and organizations that support the DREAM Act. What good is a green card to a dead person? What good is a green card to a young person severely wounded in mind and body?

Given that there is no end in sight to unjust war in Iraq and a potential war with Iran, it was not a gamble I was willing to take. The bill did create a “crisis of conscience” for anyone who actually cares about real reform and the people it’s intended to help. After engaging in long soul-searching questions and weighing both the positives and the negatives, but I realized that the ends did not justify the means – the way we do things is as important as the results we seek! This post is not to gloat at the defeat of DREAM Act because in the bigger picture, everybody comes out losing. Our immigration system is still broken and millions will still live in the shadows.

Currently, many people had put their hopes on the DREAM Act, now that is defeated, many are feeling “sad, lonely and scared; much like the immigrants” who live in fear at the increasing number of ICE raids. Does this mean as activists we should be in the retreat? Most definitely not! But we do have to ask some real hard questions.

So why were many pro-immigrant activists and immigrants willing to settle for less? The answer is easy to explain. In today’s world, collective institutional pressure often shapes government policies and priorities: it also holds a key to public vigilance over enjoyment and protection of citizens’ rights. However, many pro-immigrant activists and immigrants are handicapped because many of them have fallen victim to the “siren songs of the DC groups and their Democrat allies” who have already sold them out to a distorted capitalist system.

Convincing the public to support policies that are, in fact, detrimental to them, requires enormous marketing skill, as well as a corporate owned and operated propaganda apparatus that is second to none. This is accomplished by cloaking harmful policies in patriotic language, and other forms of seduction, such as believing that little hope is better than no hope. It is this thinking that shapes all US policy and has brought us an endless succession of wars and other human tragedies. Policies that has sent countless young men and women dressed in military uniforms to their deaths and detained hundreds of thousands of immigrants.

New definitions are created and designed to conceal the real intent of the perpetrators of crimes against humanity. They are employed as marketing tools to make blatant theft and exploitation appear palatable to the multitudes and to the helpless victims of unfettered capitalism. Orwellian doublespeak has become the norm in this country, resulting in the enforcement arm of capitalism – the rise of a police state and an emerging Gestapo society, perpetrated in the name of a democracy that does not even exist.

This country built a reputation of providing a bright future for many immigrants, however, for many this never came true. And it will continue to break the hopes and dreams of millions of people unless we the people put a stop to it.

Related posts

Tags Tags: , , , , , , , | Print This Post Print This Post |
functional

2 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. odd » Reponses to Shattered Dreams - By ¡Para Justicia y Libertad! Trackback on Oct 30th, 2007 at 9:02 pm
  2. even » The Ray of Hope In Dark Times - By ¡Para Justicia y Libertad! Trackback on Nov 3rd, 2008 at 11:13 pm

6 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the Feed Comments (RSS) feed.

  1. Gravatar Icon duke1676 Oct 26th, 2007 at 11:45 pm

    Another excellent post…with so much to digest, I will be mulling this over for quite a while, “Thought provoking”..would be an understatement….”mind altering” might be more appropriate. Let me think on this a bit, and thanks for writing it.

  2. Gravatar Icon kyledeb Oct 27th, 2007 at 10:19 am

    Thanks for your continued principled stance, XP,

    I can’t stress how important it is that people like yourself continue to speak up about this.

    Still, am I naive for suggesting supporting the DREAM act now and opposing the Green Card Draft later? Surely after the DREAM Act is put into practice and if it truly is horrendous, can’t we focus our activism on that?

    Also do you know of any people that would benefit from the DREAM Act that are coming out against it because of this provision?

    Of course, in order to take a principled stance you don’t need someone like this, but I think it would lend so much more credibility to your argument if you knew of someone that says I prefer the shadows to the military.

    I just read that Miguel, comment, that’s ridiculous.

  3. Gravatar Icon Changeseeker Oct 28th, 2007 at 10:32 am

    Beautifully presented, XP. I have linked to this post here.

  4. Gravatar Icon fash Oct 28th, 2007 at 1:24 pm

    You do realize that the Dream Act did not require you to join the military, just the uniformed services, right? This includes the military, but also the Coast Guard, among other things.

    I really enjoy reading your blog, but it really disappoints me that you and other usually pro-immigrant people failed, like the opponents, to actually read the Dream Act, to the detriment of a million young people.

    kyledeb: I know a lot of people who would benefit from the Dream Act, and I’ve never heard anyone say so. Most who oppose do so because of the age limit, which would disqualify people who had been in the same situation but for longer, and will hopefully not be included in the next version of the bill.

  5. Gravatar Icon XicanoPwr Oct 29th, 2007 at 9:06 am

    kyledeb and fash – after writing up my response, it ended up longer than I expected, therefore, I will do this in a post, titled Reponses to Shattered Dreams.

    Meanwhile, my question would be why aren’t we focusing our activism on the poverty draft now? Just because we don’t have an official draft now, doesn’t mean that we don’t have a draft now. We have a draft going on right now – a “poverty draft.”

    Due to government cutbacks on funding for job training, education, and a very slow recovering economy, low-income families are preyed on by recruiters who promise a way out of poverty. The military spends millions each year on marketing that targets young people, promising “up to” thousands of dollars in pay – but they don’t tell you that there are only a few positions that qualify for the highest end of the pay promised.

    The moment we start asking the “what ifs,” such as, “if it truly is horrendous” we start playing the hypothetical game. But in this game, it is marketed kind of like wheel of fortune only slightly different. People are being told they get to spin the wheel and there is a 95% chance that they will win $10,000,000, however, what is left out is what happens if they land on the other 5% – their execution. People are acting as if the 5% is nothing more but just minor details – something not worry about because the important thing is to focus on the $10,000,000 they can win.

    fash, I am happy you enjoy this blog, but I am puzzled as to why you assume I haven’t read the bill itself. Maybe other pro-immigrants who are opposed to this bill haven’t, but I can assure you I not only have read it, but studied its history. In fact, I personally know the person who came up with this idea before it was ever proposed in Congress.

    Yes, I am aware uniformed services includes the Coast Guard. Section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code defines “uniformed services” as the armed forces (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard), commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and commissioned corps of the Public Health Service.

    How many people are lining up for the NOAA and PHS. To sign up for the public health service corp you have to already have a degree. And to be in the corp for NOAA, same thing. And for the Coast Guard, they are highly selective and very limited. I know because I have looked into it several times.

    Sorry, they can call it whatever they want, but the truth of the matter, it means one thing … they military.

  6. Gravatar Icon XicanoPwr Oct 29th, 2007 at 9:36 am

    Changeseeker – Thank you. Great post.

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.

Bear
functional