<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disney: Not the Happiest Place on Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/</link>
	<description>because there are somethings still worth fighting for!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:07:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: msondo</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4659</link>
		<dc:creator>msondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4659</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, thanks for sharing.  I&#039;m actually not as familiar with the theme park side of the business.  I just know that lately, from first-hand knowledge, their electronic side has been expanding fast to keep up with success, and their tv and movie side has been great as well with hot properties like High School Musical and Camp Rock.  Price variables and labor activity are all symptoms of a free market.  I think for somebody at the low end of the economic spectrum a strike or an effort to unionize is a huge undertaking and involves considerable financial and personal risk.  If people are willing to do it it must indicate things are bad enough that they are willing to assume such a risk.  I think companies should learn that in order to avoid such hassle they should just treat their employees fairly.  Just as a company has to brace itself and deal with a variable such as fuel costs that they have no control over, they should deal with labor relations in way that keeps everybody happy, especially since they do have control over that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, thanks for sharing.  I&#8217;m actually not as familiar with the theme park side of the business.  I just know that lately, from first-hand knowledge, their electronic side has been expanding fast to keep up with success, and their tv and movie side has been great as well with hot properties like High School Musical and Camp Rock.  Price variables and labor activity are all symptoms of a free market.  I think for somebody at the low end of the economic spectrum a strike or an effort to unionize is a huge undertaking and involves considerable financial and personal risk.  If people are willing to do it it must indicate things are bad enough that they are willing to assume such a risk.  I think companies should learn that in order to avoid such hassle they should just treat their employees fairly.  Just as a company has to brace itself and deal with a variable such as fuel costs that they have no control over, they should deal with labor relations in way that keeps everybody happy, especially since they do have control over that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4654</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4654</guid>
		<description>Btw, the middle two paragraphs are from the WSJ - my quote html didn&#039;t come through. The first and last paragraphs are me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, the middle two paragraphs are from the WSJ &#8211; my quote html didn&#8217;t come through. The first and last paragraphs are me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4653</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4653</guid>
		<description>I did a little more research and here is what the WSJ has to say:

The company said attendance at its domestic resorts was off a bit from last year because this year&#039;s busy Easter holiday fell during the previous quarter. At the Disneyland Resort in Anaheim, Calif., both hotel occupancy and per-capita spending were down slightly from last year, but higher nightly room rates at the hotels helped offset the decline. Per-capita spending at Walt Disney World in Orlando was up 3%, while hotel occupancy, at 92%, was down 1% from the year-earlier period.

&quot;We aren&#039;t immune to the challenging economy but we continue to be pleased with the level of business activity we&#039;ve seen so far,&quot; Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger told analysts on the quarterly conference call. &quot;The parks&#039; performance has been particularly noteworthy.&quot; He added that visitation to Walt Disney World in Orlando was unlikely to be affected by a continuing reduction in airline seat capacity. &quot;Just under 50% of visitors to Walt Disney World are flying in and they typically book early,&quot; so there is plenty of access to available airplane seats, he said.

It does paint a growing picture of Disneyland, with growth rates of 9% over last year. But well see how that continues now that the dollar is gaining strength and we seem to be headed into a recession....maybe that is what Disneyland is bracing for by the elimination of healthcare?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a little more research and here is what the WSJ has to say:</p>
<p>The company said attendance at its domestic resorts was off a bit from last year because this year&#8217;s busy Easter holiday fell during the previous quarter. At the Disneyland Resort in Anaheim, Calif., both hotel occupancy and per-capita spending were down slightly from last year, but higher nightly room rates at the hotels helped offset the decline. Per-capita spending at Walt Disney World in Orlando was up 3%, while hotel occupancy, at 92%, was down 1% from the year-earlier period.</p>
<p>&#8220;We aren&#8217;t immune to the challenging economy but we continue to be pleased with the level of business activity we&#8217;ve seen so far,&#8221; Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger told analysts on the quarterly conference call. &#8220;The parks&#8217; performance has been particularly noteworthy.&#8221; He added that visitation to Walt Disney World in Orlando was unlikely to be affected by a continuing reduction in airline seat capacity. &#8220;Just under 50% of visitors to Walt Disney World are flying in and they typically book early,&#8221; so there is plenty of access to available airplane seats, he said.</p>
<p>It does paint a growing picture of Disneyland, with growth rates of 9% over last year. But well see how that continues now that the dollar is gaining strength and we seem to be headed into a recession&#8230;.maybe that is what Disneyland is bracing for by the elimination of healthcare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4652</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4652</guid>
		<description>But even looking at that, Disneyland does not look so good. 

 Look at their P/E, their profit margin, and their future prospects (reflected in the stock price)...and it doesn&#039;t look as good as you make it seem. However you slice it, Disneyland is going through some tough times.

PS: I agree that the stock price alone is not the &lt;i&gt;entire&lt;/i&gt; picture...but the stock price, or more directly, the P/E of a stock price is probably the one thing you can point to that gives more about a company than any other &lt;i&gt;single&lt;/i&gt; indicator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But even looking at that, Disneyland does not look so good. </p>
<p> Look at their P/E, their profit margin, and their future prospects (reflected in the stock price)&#8230;and it doesn&#8217;t look as good as you make it seem. However you slice it, Disneyland is going through some tough times.</p>
<p>PS: I agree that the stock price alone is not the <i>entire</i> picture&#8230;but the stock price, or more directly, the P/E of a stock price is probably the one thing you can point to that gives more about a company than any other <i>single</i> indicator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msondo</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4651</link>
		<dc:creator>msondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4651</guid>
		<description>Sales and profit reports, typically.  In other words, the bottom line.  How much do they sell?  How much of that turns into profit?  How much will they likely sell in the future?  Take Nintendo for example.  Their stock fluctuates wildly despite the fact that they rake in more sales and profits than any other video game company.  Disney is also high on that list as well.  Both companies take in a high ratio of profits relative to other companies in their industry.  If you looked at stock performance alone it would be easy to guess otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sales and profit reports, typically.  In other words, the bottom line.  How much do they sell?  How much of that turns into profit?  How much will they likely sell in the future?  Take Nintendo for example.  Their stock fluctuates wildly despite the fact that they rake in more sales and profits than any other video game company.  Disney is also high on that list as well.  Both companies take in a high ratio of profits relative to other companies in their industry.  If you looked at stock performance alone it would be easy to guess otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious, if not the stock market, then what do you use as a measure of how well a company is doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious, if not the stock market, then what do you use as a measure of how well a company is doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msondo</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>msondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4645</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m speaking as a former employee.  Two of the last three companies I have worked for gave the &quot;opt out&quot; option.  The company I&#039;m currently with doesn&#039;t charge premiums so it doesn&#039;t make sense to opt out even though I use my wife&#039;s insurance.

Also, note that their benefits are often considered relatively weak compared to other companies.  It&#039;s a major pain point for employees and an incentive to look elsewhere.

It&#039;s dangerous to use a stock price as an indicator of how well a company is doing.  Obviously, extreme performance can be a clear indicator, but the market price of a stock is more speculative and subjective to other market pressures rather than an accurate measure of performance.  Entertainment is a very speculative industry because it ultimately relies on unpredictable consumer tastes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m speaking as a former employee.  Two of the last three companies I have worked for gave the &#8220;opt out&#8221; option.  The company I&#8217;m currently with doesn&#8217;t charge premiums so it doesn&#8217;t make sense to opt out even though I use my wife&#8217;s insurance.</p>
<p>Also, note that their benefits are often considered relatively weak compared to other companies.  It&#8217;s a major pain point for employees and an incentive to look elsewhere.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s dangerous to use a stock price as an indicator of how well a company is doing.  Obviously, extreme performance can be a clear indicator, but the market price of a stock is more speculative and subjective to other market pressures rather than an accurate measure of performance.  Entertainment is a very speculative industry because it ultimately relies on unpredictable consumer tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4632</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4632</guid>
		<description>Can you show me where you get your information from? Practically every company I know that has health care forces you to have it. Its the way  health care works - its a pooling of all employees. If it worked the way you claim, then the people that don&#039;t need health insurance would opt out - leaving the people who really need it with &lt;i&gt;significantly&lt;/i&gt; higher health care coverage. If Disneyland is doing this, I&#039;d like to see more details.

&lt;i&gt;Disney, unlike Ford and GM, makes products people actually want to buy and they rake in tons of money.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, but even Disneyland has to compete and sell tickets. And if &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=DIS&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;their stock&lt;/a&gt; is any indicator, they are not doing so differently than Ford or GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you show me where you get your information from? Practically every company I know that has health care forces you to have it. Its the way  health care works &#8211; its a pooling of all employees. If it worked the way you claim, then the people that don&#8217;t need health insurance would opt out &#8211; leaving the people who really need it with <i>significantly</i> higher health care coverage. If Disneyland is doing this, I&#8217;d like to see more details.</p>
<p><i>Disney, unlike Ford and GM, makes products people actually want to buy and they rake in tons of money.</i></p>
<p>Yes, but even Disneyland has to compete and sell tickets. And if <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=DIS" rel="nofollow">their stock</a> is any indicator, they are not doing so differently than Ford or GM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msondo</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4631</link>
		<dc:creator>msondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4631</guid>
		<description>Actually, if you do qualify for benefits you do get the choice of either opting in to a healthcare plan or opting out and receiving a higher wage.  Nobody would be receiving a benefit they don&#039;t need, at least based on the corporate policy I&#039;m familiar with.

Also, it doesn&#039;t make sense to compare Disney to GM and Ford.  Disney, unlike Ford and GM, makes products people actually want to buy and they rake in tons of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if you do qualify for benefits you do get the choice of either opting in to a healthcare plan or opting out and receiving a higher wage.  Nobody would be receiving a benefit they don&#8217;t need, at least based on the corporate policy I&#8217;m familiar with.</p>
<p>Also, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to compare Disney to GM and Ford.  Disney, unlike Ford and GM, makes products people actually want to buy and they rake in tons of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I'm Not The Only One</title>
		<link>http://xicanopwr.com/2008/08/disney-not-the-happiest-place-on-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-4620</link>
		<dc:creator>I'm Not The Only One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xicanopwr.com/?p=670#comment-4620</guid>
		<description>Hispanic Pundit has the right idea.  Unlike the federal government who can run trillions of dollars in debt, corporations do not have that luxury.  If they incur enough debt, their employees will not have to worry about health benefits and salary because the company will file for bankruptcy and they will be unemployed.

Disney&#039;s hotels, theme parks and stores require a certain number of employees to keep it operating at a level that will keep customers satisfied.  Paying more money to give the same benefits to part-time employees as full-time employees means less money to hire more employees or worse, keep some employees on the payroll.

Government doesn&#039;t really have to worry about debt, which is why part-time employees (whose paychecks are obviously smaller than those of their full-time colleagues) should be able to turn to the government for health insurance.  Unfortunately, some members of the working poor, for reasons only known to Congress, are not deemed poor enough to qualify for Medicaid or Medicare.

State-sponsored universal health care for those who cannot afford a private insurer is not a perfect solution for millions of uninsured Americans, but it&#039;s a better and more realistic solution than using the law to force private companies to provide health benefits to its employees.

Besides, if the union cares so damn much about its low-wage workers, perhaps they shouldn&#039;t make them pay union dues.   If the unions don&#039;t know where in their budget to cut expenses to allow low-wage workers free union membership, perhaps they should look at the six-figure salaries of their highest ranking officers.  Most union bosses are paid very well, growing fat off the union dues of the working poor.  That&#039;s worse than any allegation of &quot;corporate greed&quot; that I could ever think of.

Go ahead, boycott Disney.  Warner Bros. is funnier anyway and Six Flags theme parks are way better than Disney World.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hispanic Pundit has the right idea.  Unlike the federal government who can run trillions of dollars in debt, corporations do not have that luxury.  If they incur enough debt, their employees will not have to worry about health benefits and salary because the company will file for bankruptcy and they will be unemployed.</p>
<p>Disney&#8217;s hotels, theme parks and stores require a certain number of employees to keep it operating at a level that will keep customers satisfied.  Paying more money to give the same benefits to part-time employees as full-time employees means less money to hire more employees or worse, keep some employees on the payroll.</p>
<p>Government doesn&#8217;t really have to worry about debt, which is why part-time employees (whose paychecks are obviously smaller than those of their full-time colleagues) should be able to turn to the government for health insurance.  Unfortunately, some members of the working poor, for reasons only known to Congress, are not deemed poor enough to qualify for Medicaid or Medicare.</p>
<p>State-sponsored universal health care for those who cannot afford a private insurer is not a perfect solution for millions of uninsured Americans, but it&#8217;s a better and more realistic solution than using the law to force private companies to provide health benefits to its employees.</p>
<p>Besides, if the union cares so damn much about its low-wage workers, perhaps they shouldn&#8217;t make them pay union dues.   If the unions don&#8217;t know where in their budget to cut expenses to allow low-wage workers free union membership, perhaps they should look at the six-figure salaries of their highest ranking officers.  Most union bosses are paid very well, growing fat off the union dues of the working poor.  That&#8217;s worse than any allegation of &#8220;corporate greed&#8221; that I could ever think of.</p>
<p>Go ahead, boycott Disney.  Warner Bros. is funnier anyway and Six Flags theme parks are way better than Disney World.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
